develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2000

Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???

Dan Sugalski
April 4, 2000 08:38
Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???
Message ID:
At 09:29 AM 4/4/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >>     Undefined value in lexical $x defined at line 23 of
> >>     Undefined value in global $Foo::y at line 23 of
> >If we're storing enough data to give partially meaningful messages then
> >yes, we should provide some way to ferret out the name of the variable in
> >these cases.
>Oops,  I meant more like this:
>     Undefined value in lexical $x first defined at line 14 of
>         used at line 23 of
>     Undefined value in global $Foo::y at line 23 of
>That is, you must name a lexical according to where it is first
>defined, but a global according to its package.

Sure--should we add in the recursion level too while we're at it?


--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About