Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2000
At 09:29 AM 4/4/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >> Undefined value in lexical $x defined at line 23 of Foo.pm
> >> Undefined value in global $Foo::y at line 23 of Foo.pm
>
> >If we're storing enough data to give partially meaningful messages then
> >yes, we should provide some way to ferret out the name of the variable in
> >these cases.
>
>Oops, I meant more like this:
>
> Undefined value in lexical $x first defined at line 14 of Foo.pm
> used at line 23 of Foo.pm
> Undefined value in global $Foo::y at line 23 of Foo.pm
>
>That is, you must name a lexical according to where it is first
>defined, but a global according to its package.
Sure--should we add in the recursion level too while we're at it?
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk