develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2000

Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???

From:
Philip Newton
Date:
April 4, 2000 06:29
Subject:
Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???
Message ID:
Pine.LNX.4.04.10004040925210.25448-100000@ficus.frogspace.net
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Richard Foley wrote:

> Philip Newton wrote:
> > 
> > You're kidding, right?
> Nope, and nor are a few other, I guess I should read the bug database... :-\

That's why I was asking -- this question has been making the rounds of p5p
for the last week or so (or two weeks?), and it was explained why the
warning produced is the way it is. Whether this is good or confusing
depends on whom you ask.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <newton@newton.digitalspace.net>




nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About