Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2000
Gurusamy Sarathy wrote: > > On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:18:43 EDT, Norton Allen wrote: > >Andy Dougherty wrote: > >> So what to do? Since you have apparently ignored this information the > >> first time I presented it, I will not waste my time repeating it, but we > >> built in both binary compatibility by default (so many folks don't have to > >> rebuild anything) and source compatibility by two different optional > >> routes. We did this about 16 months ago so CPAN authors might have time > >> to catch up and adjust. > > > > I really have no argument with any of this, but isn't it true > > that something changed at almost the last minute that forced > > the issue? > > Not true. There were no changes to the PERL_POLLUTE default or any of > the pollution variables since as far back as October 1999. > > > My module compiled without changes as late as .670, > > possibly with RC1, but required na => PL_na attention by RC2. > > I don't see anything about this in the archives. Did you report it via > perlbug? > > > Sarathy > gsar@ActiveState.com >Thread Previous | Thread Next