Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2000
On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:18:43 EDT, Norton Allen wrote: >Andy Dougherty wrote: >> So what to do? Since you have apparently ignored this information the >> first time I presented it, I will not waste my time repeating it, but we >> built in both binary compatibility by default (so many folks don't have to >> rebuild anything) and source compatibility by two different optional >> routes. We did this about 16 months ago so CPAN authors might have time >> to catch up and adjust. > > I really have no argument with any of this, but isn't it true > that something changed at almost the last minute that forced > the issue? Not true. There were no changes to the PERL_POLLUTE default or any of the pollution variables since as far back as October 1999. > My module compiled without changes as late as .670, > possibly with RC1, but required na => PL_na attention by RC2. I don't see anything about this in the archives. Did you report it via perlbug? Sarathy gsar@ActiveState.comThread Previous | Thread Next