On 1 Apr 2000, Simon Cozens wrote: > Yeah, a bunch of bugs have been fixed. So, what, I'm reduced to calling > it a bugfix release? But that would have been 5.005_04. Whoa. It's not "Perl 6". The numbering convention changed, and if you can buy that then it's only a .1 change. It's got a LONG changelog for a .1 change, at least in my book. What exactly is the point of all this bitching? Do you want to rewrite the past? Are you volunteering to make sure 5.7 is totally awesome? -samThread Previous | Thread Next