Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2000
At 5.08 -0600 2000.04.01, David Grove wrote: >I've never heard of any perfect piece of software, especially in its first >release. But there's a vast difference between imperfect and broken. Against my own advice to ignore this source, I'd just like to point out that this source has given not one shred of evidence that perl 5.6 is broken, in any way. w00p! -- Chris Nandor | pudge@pobox.com | http://pudge.net/ Andover.Net | chris.nandor@andover.net | http://slashcode.com/Thread Previous