Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2000
From: Hugo [mailto:hv@crypt.compulink.co.uk]
...
> The only thing then that still slightly worries me (after trying a couple
> of things) is this:
>
> crypt% perl -w -Ilib test
> Use of uninitialized value in addition (+) at lib/A.pm line 3.
> Use of uninitialized value in addition (+) at lib/B.pm line 4.
> crypt%
>
> .. and I don't understand why A::a warns but not C::c.
>
> Hugo
> --- test
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> use A;
> use B;
> use C;
>
> B::all
>
> --- A.pm
> package A;
>
> sub a { $undef + 0 }
>
> 1;
> --- B.pm
> package B;
> use warnings;
>
> sub b { $undef + 0 }
> sub all { A::a; B::b; C::c }
>
> 1;
> --- C.pm
> package C;
>
> sub c { $undef + 0 }
>
> 1;
> --- end
It's nothing to do with warnings. Put a "use strict 'subs'" in B.pm
Bareword "C::c" not allowed while "strict subs" in use at B.pm line 6.
Changing C::c to C::c() or rearranging the order the modules get
included in test makes it do what you expect.
sub all { A::a; B::b; C::c() }
Paul
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next