Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2000
At 05:14 PM 3/16/00 +0000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> > One alternative would be to include Storable in the core, which would mean
> > no incompatibility problems like those: since many modules depend on
> > Storable working, and due to its sensitivity to Perl internals, I've come
> > to the conclusion that it's the only sensible choice in the long term.
> >
> > Despite being close to the 5.6 release, I ask you that you consider it.
>
>It would get my vote.
While I'd like it too, there are probably a bunch of base platforms it
doesn't work on. It's awfully close to 5.6 to get it going on them...
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next