develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2000

Re: A plea for more pollution

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Dan Sugalski
Date:
March 16, 2000 09:16
Subject:
Re: A plea for more pollution
Message ID:
4.3.0.20000316121635.01cec7a0@24.8.96.48
At 05:14 PM 3/16/00 +0000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> > One alternative would be to include Storable in the core, which would mean
> > no incompatibility problems like those: since many modules depend on
> > Storable working, and due to its sensitivity to Perl internals, I've come
> > to the conclusion that it's the only sensible choice in the long term.
> >
> > Despite being close to the 5.6 release, I ask you that you consider it.
>
>It would get my vote.

While I'd like it too, there are probably a bunch of base platforms it 
doesn't work on. It's awfully close to 5.6 to get it going on them...

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
dan@sidhe.org                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About