On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 11:58:57AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: >> Last time when I submitted similar thing for 4.*, I was corrected, >> and 4.0* was put in freebsd.sh instead. :-) > Then whoever did that "correcting" was wrong :-). Well, I am not so sure about that. The problem is, we are not talking here about `specific minor version differences'; rather, 5.0-current as of March 2000, and 5.0-current as of March 2001 (and 5.1-release as of April 2001) will be very different. 5.0 just forked off 4.0, and has a long time ahead, with lots of changes coming. So basically, I think that 5.0* is as reasonable _today_ as 5.* is - there is a good chance of additional hits tweaking to be done later this year. Cheers, -- Anton Berezin <tobez@plab.ku.dk> The Protein Laboratory, University of CopenhagenThread Previous | Thread Next