develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2000

Re: [ID 20000330.052] Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.)

Gurusamy Sarathy
March 31, 2000 15:04
Re: [ID 20000330.052] Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.)
Message ID:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 17:47:30 EST, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
>>   * I ran out of time a _long_ time ago (you wouldn't believe the
>>     amount of "real work" that has slipped just so I can herd the Perl
>>     cats into reasonable shape for a release)
>There is no way to make a bullet-proof whatever.whatever.0 release.
>However, since we know it is *very much* flawed, having it mentioned

This is pure FUD.  AFAIK, 5.6.0 has fewer bugs than 5.005_03 does.

If you think otherwise, prove it.  (For proof to the contrary, you can
start by running the 5.6.0 testsuite with 5.005_03. ;-)

>in the announcement would look more proper.
>>   * I entertain vague hopes that perhaps putting out a release will
>>     spur contributions to address the experimental features
>Definitely.  We on p5p have a clear understanding of the (mis)quality
>of 5.6.0, [...]

Er, I think you're in the Land of Conclusions again.

Sarathy Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About