develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2000

Re: [ID 20000330.052] Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.)

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
simon
Date:
March 31, 2000 05:31
Subject:
Re: [ID 20000330.052] Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.)
Message ID:
slrn8e9a4s.rsv.simon@othersideofthe.earth.li
Mike Giroux (lists.p5p):
>I'm sorry if I'm extending this argument needlessly, but I think it's
>just plain _wrong_ to require the end user of a compiler to understand
>the internal optimizations just to decode the error messages.  

Oh, for heaven's sake, stop being ridiculous. It's nothing to do with
the internal optimisations. It's about the user working out what the
error messages mean. And if the user can't even be expected to do that -
and I don't want pass Perl users off as that stupid, even if you're
happy to do so - the user has perldiag.

You know we have perldiag, right?
You know we have it for a reason?

-- 
I took a course in speed waiting.  Now I can wait an hour in only ten minutes.
        -- Steven Wright

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About