develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2000

Re: [ID 20000330.052] Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.)

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Ronald J Kimball
Date:
March 30, 2000 20:31
Subject:
Re: [ID 20000330.052] Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.)
Message ID:
20000330233120.H171600@linguist.dartmouth.edu
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 08:29:00PM -0800, William R. Ward wrote:
> Tom Christiansen writes:
>  > >I agree.  The same correction was made for the comparison operators;
>  > >originally the warning did not distinguish between numeric and string
>  > >comparison operators.  The warning should accurately reflect the code as
>  > >written.
>  >
>  > So, you prefer a nonoptimizing compiler, eh?
>
> I would prefer warnings the way they used to be, if it's that hard.

I would prefer your Option #2, "... in concatenation (.) or interpolation
... "

Specifying the operator involved is too useful to back out over one point
of confusion.

Ronald

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About