Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2000
At 10.23 +0000 2000.03.22, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>> # More work on a safe and secure execution environment
>> # for mobile agents
>>
>> Is Safe not enough? What's left? What about safeperl?
>
>Safe simply doesn't work in its current state.
It does, but not in all cases. The only problems I saw with Safe in the
exchange with you and Tom is with other packages and requiring and
importing and such. This is something that needs to be fixed eventually,
but I don't want statements like that above to drive people away from using
Safe to do operations that do work.
--
Chris Nandor | pudge@pobox.com | http://pudge.net/
Andover.Net | chris.nandor@andover.net | http://slashcode.com/
-=-
/* And you'll never guess what the dog had */
/* in its mouth... */
--Larry Wall in stab.c from the perl source code
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next