Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL?

Peter Scott wrote:
> 
> 
> Hmm... overload =~ ?  With a default statement handle (last one
> opened)?  The mind boggles (well, mine does, anyway).

Mine also. Very cool. The parallels with current syntax are quite
attractive.

> 
> I also like the idea of user-defined qc//...
> 
> --
> Peter Scott
> Pacific Systems Design Technologies

--
Mark T. Johns, Webmaster, RIMS - http://www.rims.com/
email: xmtj@rims.com  - BBS: http://rimsweb.rims.com/ubb/
voice: (630) 428-5389

• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Tom Christiansen
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Greg Bacon
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Joseph N. Hall
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Dan Sugalski
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Joseph N. Hall
• Smoke [5.9.0] 21440 PASS linux 2.4.18-bf2.4 (i686/1 cpu) (GNU libc 2.2.5) by abigail
• hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Joseph N. Hall
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by M.J.T. Guy
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Joseph N. Hall
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Dominic Dunlop
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Joseph N. Hall
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by M.J.T. Guy
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Joseph N. Hall
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by M.J.T. Guy
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Sam Tregar
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Joseph N. Hall
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Sam Tregar
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Peter Scott
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Joseph N. Hall
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Mark T. Johns
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Joseph N. Hall
• Re: hook for qs// operator for embedded SQL? by Tim Bunce