Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals - nntp.perl.org

Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2000

Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals

From:

Gurusamy Sarathy

Date:

February 11, 2000 09:14

Subject:

Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals

Message ID:

200002111716.JAA18755@maul.activestate.com

On 11 Feb 2000 01:18:03 +0100, Gisle Aas wrote:
>This patch relative to 5.5.650 makes perl do the right thing for
>literals containing hibit charactets.

And here folks, we have a fine example of how to be a problem solver.
As opposed to being a problem. ;-)

Thanks.


Sarathy
gsar@ActiveState.com

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by simon

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Ilya Zakharevich

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by simon

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Matthias Urlichs

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Elaine -HFB- Ashton

Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?] by Tom Christiansen

Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?] by Autarch

Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?] by Russ Allbery
Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?] by Chip Turner

Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?] by Elaine -HFB- Ashton

Re: validity of viewpoints by Joshua N Pritikin

Re: validity of viewpoints by Elaine -HFB- Ashton

Re: validity of viewpoints by Joshua N Pritikin

Re: validity of viewpoints by Elaine -HFB- Ashton

use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Mark Mielke

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Dan Sugalski

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Mark Mielke

Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?] by Jarkko Hietaniemi

Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?] by Ronald J Kimball

Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?] by Tom Christiansen

Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?] by Michael Gebis

RE: validity of viewpoints by Redford, John
v5.5.650, aka five point six beta1, is out by Gurusamy Sarathy

[PATCH] Improved hibit text literals by Gisle Aas

Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals by Gurusamy Sarathy
Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals by Gisle Aas

Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals by Ilya Zakharevich

Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals by Gisle Aas

Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals by Ilya Zakharevich

Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals by Larry Wall

Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals by Gisle Aas
Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals by Ilya Zakharevich

Re: v5.5.650, aka five point six beta1, is out by David R. Favor

Re: v5.5.650, aka five point six beta1, is out by Jarkko Hietaniemi

Re: v5.5.650, aka five point six beta1, is out by Mark Mielke

Re: v5.5.650, aka five point six beta1, is out by Larry Wall

should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Gurusamy Sarathy

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Mark Mielke

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Gregor N. Purdy

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Jeff Okamoto

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Mark Mielke

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Tom Christiansen

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Tom Christiansen

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Mark Mielke

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Tom Christiansen

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Larry Wall

use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Juanma Barranquero
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Nathan Torkington

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Jarkko Hietaniemi

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Mark Mielke

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Chip Turner

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Mark Mielke

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Martyn Pearce

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Ilya Zakharevich

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Russ Allbery
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Dan Sugalski
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Paul Schinder

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Mark Mielke

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Sam Tregar

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Mark Mielke

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Matthias Urlichs

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Larry Wall

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by sthoenna
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Mark Mielke

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Nathan Torkington

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Jeff Pinyan

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by Larry Wall

Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's" by John L. Allen

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Tom Christiansen

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Tom Christiansen

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Mark Mielke

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Raphael Manfredi
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Dan Sugalski

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Rich Morin

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Jarkko Hietaniemi

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Tom Christiansen

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Joshua N Pritikin

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Raphael Manfredi

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Nick Ing-Simmons
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Joshua N Pritikin

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Dan Sugalski

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Ed Mooring
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Joshua N Pritikin
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Ilya Zakharevich

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Nathan Torkington

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Mark Mielke

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Andy Dougherty

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Mark Mielke

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Ilya Zakharevich
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Andy Dougherty

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Gisle Aas

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Gisle Aas

Unicode character composition by Jarkko Hietaniemi

Re: Unicode character composition by Ilya Zakharevich

Re: Unicode character composition by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Andy Dougherty

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Chip Salzenberg

[ANNOUNCE] Test::More/Builder/Simple 0.86 (cmp_ok() fixage warning) by Michael G Schwern

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Tom Christiansen

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Mark Mielke

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Tom Christiansen

validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?] by Ronald J Kimball
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Mark Mielke

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Mark Mielke

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Joshua N Pritikin

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Tom Christiansen

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Larry Wall

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Tom Christiansen

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Jim Anderson

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Tom Christiansen

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"? by Jarkko Hietaniemi

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About