Front page
|
perl.perl5.porters
|
Postings from February 2000
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
From:
Larry Wall
Date:
February 10, 2000 09:08
Subject:
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
Message ID:
200002101707.JAA02879@kiev.wall.org
Mark Mielke writes: <bait> You too, Mark. Larry
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by simon
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Matthias Urlichs
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by simon
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Ilya Zakharevich
Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?]
by Tom Christiansen
Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?]
by Autarch
Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?]
by Russ Allbery
Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?]
by Chip Turner
Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?]
by Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Re: validity of viewpoints
by Joshua N Pritikin
Re: validity of viewpoints
by Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Re: validity of viewpoints
by Joshua N Pritikin
Re: validity of viewpoints
by Elaine -HFB- Ashton
use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Mark Mielke
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Dan Sugalski
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Mark Mielke
Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?]
by Jarkko Hietaniemi
Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?]
by Ronald J Kimball
Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?]
by Tom Christiansen
Re: validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?]
by Michael Gebis
[ANNOUNCE] Test::More/Builder/Simple 0.86 (cmp_ok() fixage warning)
by Michael G Schwern
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Jeff Okamoto
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Mark Mielke
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Tom Christiansen
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Tom Christiansen
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Mark Mielke
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Tom Christiansen
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Larry Wall
use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Juanma Barranquero
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Nathan Torkington
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Jarkko Hietaniemi
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Mark Mielke
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Chip Turner
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Mark Mielke
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Martyn Pearce
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Ilya Zakharevich
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Russ Allbery
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Dan Sugalski
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Paul Schinder
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Mark Mielke
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Sam Tregar
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Mark Mielke
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Matthias Urlichs
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Larry Wall
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by sthoenna
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Mark Mielke
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Nathan Torkington
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Jeff Pinyan
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by Larry Wall
Re: use octets; and "escaping the piranha's"
by John L. Allen
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Tom Christiansen
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Tom Christiansen
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Mark Mielke
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Raphael Manfredi
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Dan Sugalski
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Rich Morin
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Jarkko Hietaniemi
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Tom Christiansen
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Joshua N Pritikin
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Raphael Manfredi
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Nick Ing-Simmons
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Joshua N Pritikin
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Dan Sugalski
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Ed Mooring
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Joshua N Pritikin
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Ilya Zakharevich
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Nathan Torkington
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Mark Mielke
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Andy Dougherty
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Mark Mielke
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Ilya Zakharevich
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Andy Dougherty
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Gisle Aas
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Gisle Aas
Unicode character composition
by Jarkko Hietaniemi
Re: Unicode character composition
by Ilya Zakharevich
Re: Unicode character composition
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Andy Dougherty
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Chip Salzenberg
v5.5.650, aka five point six beta1, is out
by Gurusamy Sarathy
[PATCH] Improved hibit text literals
by Gisle Aas
Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals
by Gurusamy Sarathy
Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals
by Gisle Aas
Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals
by Ilya Zakharevich
Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals
by Gisle Aas
Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals
by Ilya Zakharevich
Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals
by Larry Wall
Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals
by Gisle Aas
Re: [PATCH] Improved hibit text literals
by Ilya Zakharevich
Re: v5.5.650, aka five point six beta1, is out
by David R. Favor
Re: v5.5.650, aka five point six beta1, is out
by Jarkko Hietaniemi
Re: v5.5.650, aka five point six beta1, is out
by Mark Mielke
Re: v5.5.650, aka five point six beta1, is out
by Larry Wall
should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Gurusamy Sarathy
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Mark Mielke
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Gregor N. Purdy
RE: validity of viewpoints
by Redford, John
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Tom Christiansen
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Jarkko Hietaniemi
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Tom Christiansen
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Jarkko Hietaniemi
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Jim Anderson
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Tom Christiansen
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Tom Christiansen
validity of viewpoints [was Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?]
by Ronald J Kimball
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Mark Mielke
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Mark Mielke
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Larry Wall
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Joshua N Pritikin
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Tom Christiansen
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
by Mark Mielke
nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to
Ask Bjørn Hansen
at
ask@perl.org
|
Group listing
|
About