develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2000

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?

From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
February 10, 2000 08:41
Subject:
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
Message ID:
14498.59941.294377.610611@beta.hut.fi

Tom Christiansen writes:
 > >FWIW I'm in favor of 'octets' (sic).  I'm an engineer; the term is more
 > >precise; I cannot help myself :-)
 > 
 > That's the same urge that asks for 
 > 
 >     utilize octets;
 > vs
 >     use bytes;
 > 
 > Perl has always revelled in its pedestrian roots.  If we want to
 > start adding the kind of pretentious fufi-talk that "octets" sounds
 > like to the regular speaker, it will lose some of its charm.  I
 > have a wealth of other suggestions along those lines waiting for
 > when you make that decision. :-)

We all know you are a walking dictionary of several languages, no need
to pound your chest at us...  oh well, whatever you choose to call it,
make it plural.

 > --tom

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About