develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2000

Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?

From:
Joshua N Pritikin
Date:
February 9, 2000 13:17
Subject:
Re: should "use byte" be "use bytes"?
Message ID:
20000209161614.Y16458@eq1062.wks.na.deuba.com
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 03:43:18PM -0500, dan@sidhe.org wrote:
> At 03:33 PM 2/9/00 -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> >My sense is that, "octet" is a snobbish jargonesque word for "byte."
> >With respect to "ascii," does everyone know that ascii characters are
> >always bytes?  Certainly "bytes" are always bytes, so "bytes" would seem
> >hard to misinterpret.
> 
> When the RFCs first started coming out, bytes weren't always 8 bits, 
> though, hence octet. Not that perl runs on any TOPS-20 machines (does it?), 
> but byte has historically ranged between 6 and 9 bits depending on the 
> machine you were on.

Oops!  My shallow experience shows.  *blush*

-- 
"Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
                            via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About