On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 03:43:18PM -0500, dan@sidhe.org wrote: > At 03:33 PM 2/9/00 -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > >My sense is that, "octet" is a snobbish jargonesque word for "byte." > >With respect to "ascii," does everyone know that ascii characters are > >always bytes? Certainly "bytes" are always bytes, so "bytes" would seem > >hard to misinterpret. > > When the RFCs first started coming out, bytes weren't always 8 bits, > though, hence octet. Not that perl runs on any TOPS-20 machines (does it?), > but byte has historically ranged between 6 and 9 bits depending on the > machine you were on. Oops! My shallow experience shows. *blush* -- "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank