develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2000

Re: proposed perlpod.pod patch

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Ilya Zakharevich
February 4, 2000 14:05
Re: proposed perlpod.pod patch
Message ID:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 04:02:42PM -0600, Brad Appleton wrote:
> > How can C<::> be better than C<<>>?
> I certainly like the looks of C<<>> more than C<::>, but the latter can
> seem "better" in that C<< 0> is no longer ambiguous or an issue as it
> is with C<< ... >>. Is there something similar that may commonly occur
> like C<: 0> or C<: xxx>???

Of course.  Say, C<:> ;-).  Or C<:tag_name>.


Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About