develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2000

Re: proposed perlpod.pod patch

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Ilya Zakharevich
Date:
February 4, 2000 14:05
Subject:
Re: proposed perlpod.pod patch
Message ID:
20000204170516.A24108@monk.mps.ohio-state.edu
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 04:02:42PM -0600, Brad Appleton wrote:
> > How can C<::> be better than C<<>>?
> 
> I certainly like the looks of C<<>> more than C<::>, but the latter can
> seem "better" in that C<< 0> is no longer ambiguous or an issue as it
> is with C<< ... >>. Is there something similar that may commonly occur
> like C<: 0> or C<: xxx>???

Of course.  Say, C<:> ;-).  Or C<:tag_name>.

Ilya

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About