Simon Cozens writes: > This now makes sense, and that's roughly how I had thunk it should go. > At least this way is relatively easy to implement: special-case > \c\[something] then fall back to parsing from \c if there wasn't a > following backslash - that way we could get it all in one left-right > pass, which seems the most intuitive, even if it isn't. As Larry explains, it breaks many other expectations one has about quoting. Currently $a = '\c\\'; /$a/ does what one expects. Your change will break it. IlyaThread Previous | Thread Next