On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 04:55:59AM -0500, Philip Newton wrote: > OK. I see what you mean now. No, I suppose I don't want that. I suppose > what I want was expressed, more or less, by Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes > elsewhere in this thread. Something along the lines of having \-conversion > (\n \f etc.) done in parallel with \c-conversion, and having \c\ do > roughly the same thing as \c if the following character is either a > backslash or the closing delimiter, e.g. "\c\\", "\c\"", qq^\c\^^. you are missing the *most important* point again: closing " is found first. IlyaThread Previous | Thread Next