Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes writes: > I realise that this behavior is perfectly in accord with perlop/"Gory > details"/"Finding the end". That doesn't mean it's not a bug. It > just means that if it is a code bug it is also a doc bug. > > IMO, it also contradicts the beginning of perlop/"Gory details": > > When presented with something which may have several > > different interpretations, Perl uses the principle DWIM > > (expanded to Do What I Mean - not what I wrote) to pick up > > the most probable interpretation of the source. This is taken out of context. > A: "\c\" > B: "\c\"more string here" > > The question is, is the current incomprehesible behavior of string B > more important to maintain than following DWIM for "string" A? Perl uses a very simple rule to find an end of a quoted construct. All one needs to do is to learn it. Hope this help, IlyaThread Previous | Thread Next