PRAGMA musing: "no scope"

    BEGIN {
	no scope;  # previous nested lexical scope boundary erased
	require Config;
	if ($Config::Config{archname} =~ /i186/) {
	    no scope;  # previous nested lexical scope boundary erased
	    use integer;
	    no  warnings qw/numeric/;
	    use warnings qw/FATAL overflow/;
	} 
    } 

This is only slightly more disgusting than upscope.  And it doesn't
allow an unrelated/non-nested scope to be pierced, such as a do()ne file.

--tom

• PRAGMA musing: "no scope" by Tom Christiansen
• Re: PRAGMA musing: "no scope" by Larry Wall
• Re: PRAGMA musing: "no scope" by Ilya Zakharevich
• Re: PRAGMA musing: "no scope" by Tom Christiansen
• Re: PRAGMA musing: "no scope" by Jeff Pinyan