>But otherwise, it's great idea, right? :-) Yes, actually. >Hmm, I can't see it. Never mind, and thanks for the ultra-prompt >reply! (BTW., was perlbug a reasonable address to send this to?) No, you have a good point. It's exceedingly annoying to have a program die halfway through due to a seldom traversed codepath that includes a call to the lenght() function. Some pragma could be arranged to help this. no autoload; or use warnings 'undefuncalls'; or some such. That doesn't solve the issue for method calls, and it is compile-time only warnings. I'm not sure whether this should be foisted off into B::Lint as it is now. Did you know about that? This: perl -MO=Lint,-context,-undefined-subs myperlprogram might make you happy. Then again, that's hardly a user-friendly front end. What ever happened to the idea of a plint program that did the icky work for you, akin to perlcc? --tomThread Previous | Thread Next