Re: [ID 19991026.001] perl segmentation fault report

Gurusamy Sarathy writes:
> >I'm continuing to see this segmentation fault.  The last suggestion from
> >the list was that I had  PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL set to a value greater
> >than 2.  But I don't have any such variable set in my shell variable
> >environment.  Is there someplace within perl's configuration environment
> >where this might be set?
> 
> The test harness enables PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL for all tests not
> known to leak scalars due to compile-time failures.  If you're
> getting a test failure due to "Scalars Leaked", it means there
> is a new scalar leak somewhere.

Nope.  The test in question *already has* "we have a known leak" clause.

Ilya

• Re: [ID 19991026.001] perl segmentation fault report by Larry W. Virden
• Re: [ID 19991026.001] perl segmentation fault report by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [ID 19991026.001] perl segmentation fault report by Ilya Zakharevich
• Re: [ID 19991026.001] perl segmentation fault report by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [ID 19991026.001] perl segmentation fault report by Ilya Zakharevich
• Re: [ID 19991026.001] perl segmentation fault report by andreas.koenig
• Re: [ID 19991026.001] perl segmentation fault report by Ilya Zakharevich