In <19991102214104.A74@monk.mps.ohio-state.edu>, Ilya Zakharevich <ilya@math.ohio-state.edu> wrote: > How one would > write a "universal" unmarshaller? Obviously, one needs to store > unmarshalling instructions together with stringified data. > > This leads to unpack 't' which I wrote. I would like to see this (New Year's wish): # -- on the sending side: $msg = pack 't', \&foo; # -- on the receiving side: sub foo; ( *foo ) = unpack 't', $msg; -- John PorterThread Previous | Thread Next