Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack

On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:

> The answer is YES: one needs different marshalling code, but this does
> not mean that one needs different unmarshalling code!  How one would
> write a "universal" unmarshaller?  Obviously, one needs to store
> unmarshalling instructions together with stringified data.

Like Data::Dumper does?  Or am I missing a subtle distinction?  I've used
Data::Dumper for marshalling, and then used eval() for unmarshalling!

-sam

• [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Ilya Zakharevich
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Ilya Zakharevich
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Joshua N Pritikin
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Ilya Zakharevich
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by John Porter
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Ilya Zakharevich
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Sam Tregar
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Ilya Zakharevich
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Ilya Zakharevich
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Greg McCarroll
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [PATCH 5.005_62] First round of unpack by Jarkko Hietaniemi