At 08:43 AM 10/26/99 -0400, Rob Cunningham wrote: >Yes. 62 came out just as we were poking at the ugly bits of perl, so we >started work there. I hope that people really stop adding features and >concentrate on getting the included features to work properly. Then here's a question--would you be willing to trade off some of the speed that came with _62 to get a thread-safe (well, safer, at least) core? No promises of atomicity or anything, but making unsynchronized access to shared variables not potentially core? >And as for bravery--we're not! We need this fix, or we wouldn't do it. Hey, you're in there and haven't gone gibbering off into the night waving to Aldeberaan. You're not giving yourself enough credit here... :) Dan ----------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk