develooper Front page | | Postings from November 2003

Re: Call back units

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Andy Dougherty
November 14, 2003 08:51
Re: Call back units
Message ID:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 wrote:

> "H.Merijn Brand" <> wrote:
> :> > ticket #18238 is also in my 'investigate' box [...]
> :> though the SKIP block in the tests should probably be revisited in bleadperl.
> :
> :That's up to Hugo.
> What particular aspect of the SKIP block are we talking about here?
> I assume we're talking about the block introduced to ext/POSIX/t/posix.t
> by change #18267.

Oh, sorry, didn't mean to be vague.  I had just read the comment about
'smoke tests' in the patch in ticket 18238, and thought that it would be a
good idea to do something like what the comment suggested.

That is, the patch had a guess at a list of operating systems that would
try the test.  Everyone else would skip it.  (Or maybe I have that
backwards.)  For the development track, at least as a first pass, I think
the test should be tried on all operating systems.  If some are to be
skipped, that decision should probably be based on the absence or presence
of some particular relevant feature in  If Configure doesn't
test for that feature yet, then the development track is a good time to
put that test in.

    Andy Dougherty

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About