develooper Front page | perl.perl5.build | Postings from November 2003

Re: Call back units

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
November 13, 2003 15:09
Subject:
Re: Call back units
Message ID:
20031113224949.GJ6287@plum.flirble.org
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 04:10:59PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> As announced in my plans somewhere back in september 2002, I finally found
> time to check and change.

Good stuff. Thanks

> --- hints/solaris_2.sh	2003-10-27 18:28:33.000000000 +0100
> +++ hints/solaris_2.sh	2003-11-01 15:21:43.000000000 +0100
> @@ -448,15 +448,12 @@
>  		exit 1
>  		;;
>  	    esac
> -	    ;;
> -esac
> +
>  # gcc-2.8.1 on Solaris 8 with -Duse64bitint fails op/pat.t test 822
>  # if we compile regexec.c with -O.  Turn off optimization for that one
>  # file.  See hints/README.hints , especially 
>  # =head2 Propagating variables to config.sh, method 3.
>  #  A. Dougherty  May 24, 2002
> -case "$use64bitint" in
> -"$define")
>      case "${gccversion}-${optimize}" in
>      2.8*-O*)
>  	# Honor a command-line override (rather unlikely)
> End-of-patch

You seem to take out an esac without putting it back in anywhere?
How does this work? From inspection of just the patch, doesn't this
make things unbalanced?

Nicholas Clark

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About