Front page | perl.perl5.build |
Postings from November 2003
Re: Call back units
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
November 13, 2003 15:09
Subject:
Re: Call back units
Message ID:
20031113224949.GJ6287@plum.flirble.org
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 04:10:59PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> As announced in my plans somewhere back in september 2002, I finally found
> time to check and change.
Good stuff. Thanks
> --- hints/solaris_2.sh 2003-10-27 18:28:33.000000000 +0100
> +++ hints/solaris_2.sh 2003-11-01 15:21:43.000000000 +0100
> @@ -448,15 +448,12 @@
> exit 1
> ;;
> esac
> - ;;
> -esac
> +
> # gcc-2.8.1 on Solaris 8 with -Duse64bitint fails op/pat.t test 822
> # if we compile regexec.c with -O. Turn off optimization for that one
> # file. See hints/README.hints , especially
> # =head2 Propagating variables to config.sh, method 3.
> # A. Dougherty May 24, 2002
> -case "$use64bitint" in
> -"$define")
> case "${gccversion}-${optimize}" in
> 2.8*-O*)
> # Honor a command-line override (rather unlikely)
> End-of-patch
You seem to take out an esac without putting it back in anywhere?
How does this work? From inspection of just the patch, doesn't this
make things unbalanced?
Nicholas Clark
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next