develooper Front page | perl.module-authors | Postings from December 2011

Re: The CPAN Morass

From:
Linda W
Date:
December 2, 2011 22:21
Subject:
Re: The CPAN Morass
Message ID:
4ED9BFEC.2090900@tlinx.org




Dana Hudes wrote:
> I sympathize with the compiler errors.  But its not acceptable to have someone other than the maintainer decide to remove a contribution from CPAN
----
    Who ever said anything about removing it?

    Just move it out of the main index into an 'archival' section where 
it is clear that it is no longer being maintained.

    It is there for reference, and if someone wants to pick it up and 
revive it, it will be there, but in the namespace, it would get moved 
under "Archives::"Module-2.1.2.

    We can find a workable middle ground, for most people...only the 
unreasonable need be excised.
;-) 

> BTW not everyone uses gcc.
What compiler on linux -- where perl was born, would you suggest?

If it doesn't work on freely available and unencumbered tools (i.e. 
nothing more restrictive than the license on perl), then wouldn't it 
violate the implied site license?


>  It is its own 'standard' mostly. I agree that usually C code needs to be generic and portable but this may not be possible. I have code (not mine, but that of one of the programmers I support at work)  gcc won't compile but Solaris Studio does (and vice versa alas).
>   
====
    And solaris studio is free?... no prob.   Is it limited to solaris 
platforms?  Then those items
need to note it AND if someone wants to develop the same module name for 
an unsupported platform,
then arrangements need to be made to "do the right thing" (right module 
is loaded, and top level
becomes platform/vendor agnostic)...

    This isn't rocket science folks... you all should know this.






nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About