Re: HFS+ and directory layout

On Tuesday, January 8, 2002, at 04:04 AM, Dan Kogai wrote:

> on 02.1.8 6:12 PM, Ken Williams at ken@mathforum.org wrote:
>>> * perl itself requires UFS to compile because of this
>>
>> No it doesn't - see the archives of this list for directions for
>> compiling on HFS+.  It's pretty easy.
>
>   When I say easy, it has to be as easy as
>
> ../Configure -des
> make test
> make install
>
>   is it *that* easy?

I wasn't aware that you said "easy".  But I agree with you about what 
*should* happen, and to a large extent it's already happened in the 
latest development versions.


  -Ken

• Re: perl 5.6.1, Expat, etc. by Joel Rodrigues
• HFS+ and directory layout by Dan Kogai
• Re: HFS+ and directory layout by Ken Williams
• Re: HFS+ and directory layout by Dan Kogai
• Re: HFS+ and directory layout by Wilfredo Sánchez
• installscript='/usr/bin' !? [Was: Re: HFS+ and directory layout] by Dan Kogai
• Re: installscript='/usr/bin' !? [Was: Re: HFS+ and directory layout] by Ken Williams
• Re: installscript='/usr/bin' !? [Was: Re: HFS+ and directory layout] by Dan Kogai
• Re: installscript='/usr/bin' !? [Was: Re: HFS+ and directory layout] by Wilfredo Sanchez
• perl 5.6.1, Expat, etc. by Joel Rodrigues
• Re: HFS+ and directory layout by Ken Williams