Re: URI not included in libwww

cpaul <inc@fastmedia.net> writes:

> just wondering if there's an interesting reason why URI is not
> included in libwww ?

Why should it be?

It was broken out of LWP so that it could have its own development
cycle and it has lots of uses outside of LWP.  It allows other stuff
to depend on URI without having to depend of the rest of LWP which
again give you dependencies on lot more stuff.

Regards,
Gisle

• URI not included in libwww by cpaul
• Re: URI not included in libwww by Gisle Aas