Graham Barr wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 04:46:42PM +0200, Marco Marongiu wrote: > >>* rename {add,delete} methods as {add,delete}_many >>* modify search to be Net::LDAP compatible >>* add an onlyattrs parameter to new() >>* implementing the module as a subclass > > > I really think a subclass is the wrong direction. If nothing > else it will prevent somone using your class with Net::LDAPS Yes, but nothing will prevent me from creating Net::LDAPS::Whatever :-) And anyway, as I said just above, I'll run through delegation as soon as possible. >>* calling the module Net::LDAP::Extended > > > No. That name should be reserved for the return class by the > LDAP extended operation. Ok, I retire Net::LDAP::Extended, but... please, be propositive. Haven't you any idea about a name that fits? Ciao Marco -- Marco Marongiu Email: bronto@crs4.it CRS4 Research Center Phone: +39 070 2796 336 NCS Division Fax: +39 070 2796 216 NSM Group WWW: http://bugs.unica.it:4444/Thread Previous | Thread Next