Front page | perl.ithreads |
Postings from August 2002
From: Elizabeth Mattijsen
August 10, 2002 08:00
Message ID: firstname.lastname@example.org
At 12:47 PM 8/10/02 +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote:
>>Ah.. ok... I didn't know that.
>>But at least the value will only be copied to the thread that actually
>>requests it, so that is a saving I would think?
>That is how it works right now, except that it is cloned aswell, I have a
>patch that will defer the cloning of shared values.
Hmmm... thinking some more about this. Why _is_ the FETCHed value of a
tied variable saved locally? How would any internal (XS) module know
whether it would be ok to use the saved value or to do a FETCH again?
Would it not make even more sense to change this behaviour of tied variables?