Front page | perl.fwp |
Postings from March 2002
Re: TPR0 Final Results
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Rick Klement
Date:
March 7, 2002 17:53
Subject:
Re: TPR0 Final Results
Message ID:
3C8819AD.55E5148F@pacbell.net
Andrew.Savige@ir.com wrote:
>
> Ton Hospel schreef op 21 februari 2002:
> >> $\=(30+ord lc)%39+36*$\.$/for pop=~/./g;print
> >>
> >> Hey, that's 45! Stephen, are you happy now?
> >> Ton, you are the best golf post-mortem analyst in the world. :)
> >>
> > You did all the hard work, I just moved some chars around.
>
> Eugene van der Pijll schreef op 3 februari 2002:
> > Beaten? I not understand! The Andrew-Ton collective: 90 Eugene: 89.
> > Besides, your solution fails for long files.
>
> I hope this 45 restores some credibility to the Andrew-Ton collective
> whose motto is: "If you can't win the game, win the post-mortem". :)
>
> /-\ndrew
And if you can't win the game or the previous game, try to win the
previous game's post-mortem...
Crossing the 45
$\=(30+ord lc)%39+36*$\.$/for pop=~/./g;print
with the 58 by Michael Assels (which was falsely accepted, it fails for 7,8,9)
-l $_=pop;$x+=36**$y++*((ord chop)%55%48)while$_;print$x+0
and tweaking slightly, one gets:
$\=ord(lc)%87%48+36*$\.$/for pop=~/./g;print
which is a 44 :)
--
Rick Klement
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next