Simon Drabble <simon@eskimo.com> writes: > It might be instructive to have the lowest scores per hole published -- just > the scores, not the golfer. I'm stuck at a pathetic 126[0] and would like > something to aim at for my higher-scoring holes. > > > [0] - doing better than I'd expected being new to this sort of thing. > > Si. > Wondering what's wrong with his swing. Well, if the tricks I've had to pull to get down to 92 strokes are anything to go by you *really* don't want to know. I'm starting to feel dirty. -- Piers "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite." -- Jane Austen?Thread Previous | Thread Next