Front page | perl.fwp |
Postings from December 2001
In the interest of spaking as much creativity [and angst..:o)] as
possible, I think that publishing the hole-leaders reveals too much info
[e.g., John Doe now knows that he's beaten on 1 but the-best on 3,4,5,
and so can focus SOLELY on finding a trick to shave 1, rather than having
to look _everywhere_ to cut strokes].
Instead, I think that just publishing the aggregate best-score is the
right amount of info to disclose: It lets the leaders know that there are
*better* solutions to some of their holes than theirs, but not give
ANYONE a hint about where to look to shave the strokes... [actually,
this isn't *quite* true, but to first order it is if it is not updated
too often].
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:bernie@fantasyfarm.com Pearisburg, VA
--> Too many people, too few sheep <--
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next