On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 07:14 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: > Your first option is not on the table. The options on the table are: > > use DateTime; > use DateTime::Parse::MySQL; > my $dt = DateTime->from_mysql_datetime( $mysql_dt ); > print $dt->to_mysql_string(); > > or > > use DateTime; > use DateTime::Parse::MySQL; > my $dt = DateTime::Parse::MySQL->new_datetime( $mysql_dt ); > print DateTime::Parse::MySQL->mysql_datetime( $dt ); > > Frankly, I think the first one is a lot easier to use and makes more > sense. It's the decorator pattern without the dispatching overhead! Trying to catch up here a bit. It seems to me that the first option could just be a pass-through to the second. Regards, David -- David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory david@wheeler.net ICQ: 15726394 http://david.wheeler.net/ Yahoo!: dew7e Jabber: Theory@jabber.orgThread Previous | Thread Next