>>>>> "Benjamin" == Benjamin Stuhl <email@example.com> writes: Benjamin> Got to, to preserve consistant destruction sematics (at Benjamin> least, until the mess currently referred to as "global Benjamin> destruction"). Not if you seperate the language and the implementation. If you can alter the language itself, the you can make one of these two explicit. Various folks smarter than me have already thought about this; I'm just parroting. :) -- Stephen "If I claimed I was emporer just cause some moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away"