develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: perl 6 requirements

From:
Graham Barr
Date:
July 31, 2000 05:42
Subject:
Re: perl 6 requirements
Message ID:
20000731133811.T8717@pobox.com
Let's not get too carried away with just creating lists. Remember each list is
supposed to be a working group. And each working group needs a chair and a charter.

These are just comments from users. Although they may be split into groups
which would seem like good WG definitions, this list is not sufficient as a charter
for a WG IMO.

Graham.

On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 08:27:00AM -0400, Grant M. wrote:
>   I agree with this suggestion, and suggest further that discussion lists for each category be
> implemented, with a link to each list on the corresponding page. This might help resolve the issue
> listed on the "Development process and community" page, #1, "p5p has been too busy for people to
> keep up with". The separate discussion lists would allow persons familiar with one aspect of the
> language to not be overwhelmed by other discussions. (There is a 'Next" link at the top of each page
> as well, though).
> Grant M.



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About