Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available

Tim Bunce writes:
> I'd like to see us agree that choping up the guts into multiple libraries
> with well defined interfaces is a desirable goal.
> 
> Then people would be free to use/implement whatever library they wanted.
> If that happened to be a thin shim over glib, fine. Other people may want
> other implementations, also fine.

That sounds like a suggestion for Larry.  Perhaps this should be an
RFC?

Nat

• The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Simon Cozens
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Nathan Torkington
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by John Tobey
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Tim Bunce
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Nathan Torkington
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Tim Bunce
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Dan Sugalski
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Dan Sugalski
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Nathan Torkington
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by John Porter
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Graham Barr
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Dan Sugalski
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Bryan C . Warnock
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Tim Jenness
• Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available by Simon Cozens