Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from July 2000
>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@ig.co.uk> >>>>> wrote the following on Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:08:23 +0100 Tim> I'd like to (strongly) suggest that the RFCs use basic pod. Tim> [ ... ] Tim> Here's your original sample RFC: >> Sample RFC: This Is The Title Tim> =head1 TITLE Tim> This Is The Title Tim> =head1 VERSION Tim> Maintainer: Nathan Torkington <gnat@frii.com> Tim> Date: 1 April 2000 Tim> Version: 1 Tim> Mailing List: perl6-internals Tim> Number: 1 Although I realize this was meant only as an example, I would suggest that if we adopt pod (which I also strongly support), that examples indent the above information, so that it doesn't get mangled into one paragraph (as supercite did when I initially quoted the original message :-). Randy -- """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Randy J. Ray | "NSA doesn't need a key to compromise security in rjray@redhat.com | Windows. Programs like Back Orifice can do it without 415-777-9810 x246 | any keys." --Bruce Schneier on the MS/NSA controversyThread Previous | Thread Next