On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:45:48AM -0400, John Porter wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > > I'd like to (strongly) suggest that the RFCs use basic pod. > > I think we have a preponderance of opinion here. Can you bless it, Nat? > > > Tim: > > > =head1 Implementation > > > > This could be done two ways: with a rewrite of the parser or with > > a modification to `use strict'. `strict' is probably best. > > > > =head1 Parser > > > > Modifying the parser would involve bad juju. > > > > =head1 strict.pm > > > > This might be retrofittable to perl5. > > > Shouldn't that be =head2 for the latter two sections? Probably. Up to the RFC author. Tim.Thread Previous | Thread Next