Tim Bunce wrote: > I'd like to (strongly) suggest that the RFCs use basic pod. I think we have a preponderance of opinion here. Can you bless it, Nat? Tim: > =head1 Implementation > > This could be done two ways: with a rewrite of the parser or with > a modification to `use strict'. `strict' is probably best. > > =head1 Parser > > Modifying the parser would involve bad juju. > > =head1 strict.pm > > This might be retrofittable to perl5. Shouldn't that be =head2 for the latter two sections? -- John Porter