On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:08:23AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 12:36:05AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: > > > > The RFC format is plain text, slightly structured. I've enclosed > > a sample at the end of this message. The major components are: > > - Title > > - Metadata (Maintainer, Date, Version, Mailing List, Number) > > - Abstract > > - Description of the change > > - List of possible implementations (doesn't have to be at the bit > > level unless you're talking a bit-level change) that were discussed, > > with quick summary of pros and cons. > > - Suggested choice of implementation. > > I'd like to (strongly) suggest that the RFCs use basic pod. Yes. It is our dog food, and we should eat it. Peace, * Kurt Starsinic (kstar@orientation.com) ---------- Senior Network Engineer * | `It is impossible to achieve the aim without suffering.' -- J. G. Bennett |Thread Previous | Thread Next