Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from July 2000
Bradley M Kuhn <bkuhn@ebb.org> writes: > Discussion forked into "should perl define Perl" and discussion of > formats. I would like to comment (on this Request for Comment :) that I > agree with Michael strategy. I think patchers should submit a test case > along with any patches that are submitted, within reason of course. ;) I agree for all code changes (at least that are testable; I can think of a few types of code changes that aren't particularly testable and probably aren't worth testing, but I'm sure that people will understand that rules are just rules and there are exceptions). I'm unconvinced for documentation. It's hard enough to get people to write documentation; I think it's important to decrease the number of hoops they have to jump through as much as possible. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>Thread Previous | Thread Next