Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch

On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 05:20:08PM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> Meta-RFC:  RFC's should be in pod, no?

I have no idea.  Let me know when you guys come to some sort of
consensus.  Meanwhile, text always works.

-- 

Michael G Schwern      http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/      schwern@pobox.com
Just Another Stupid Consultant                      Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse
no paste enema
lycos is taught about it
my ass is sealed
        -- Schwern

• RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Michael G Schwern
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Piers Cawley
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Michael G Schwern
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Bradley M. Kuhn
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Russ Allbery
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Piers Cawley
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Hugo
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Jonathan Scott Duff
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Chaim Frenkel
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Dan Sugalski
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Piers Cawley
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by merlyn
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Russ Allbery
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Dan Sugalski
• RFC file format (was RFC: A Test For Every Patch) by tadmc
• Re: RFC file format (was RFC: A Test For Every Patch) by Tim Bunce
• Re: RFC file format (was RFC: A Test For Every Patch) by JVromans
• Re: RFC file format (was RFC: A Test For Every Patch) by Bart Schuller
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by marcel
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by John Porter
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Michael G Schwern