Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch

Meta-RFC:  RFC's should be in pod, no?


Michael G Schwern wrote:
> In One Sentence
> ---------------
>[snippage]

-- 
John Porter

• RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Michael G Schwern
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Piers Cawley
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Michael G Schwern
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Bradley M. Kuhn
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Russ Allbery
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Piers Cawley
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Hugo
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Jonathan Scott Duff
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Chaim Frenkel
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Dan Sugalski
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Piers Cawley
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by merlyn
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Russ Allbery
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Dan Sugalski
• RFC file format (was RFC: A Test For Every Patch) by tadmc
• Re: RFC file format (was RFC: A Test For Every Patch) by Tim Bunce
• Re: RFC file format (was RFC: A Test For Every Patch) by JVromans
• Re: RFC file format (was RFC: A Test For Every Patch) by Bart Schuller
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by marcel
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by John Porter
• Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch by Michael G Schwern