From: marcel@codewerk.com (Marcel Grunauer) Date: 7/26/00 10:06:56 AM >In message <20000725203504.d18710@panix.com>, Adam Turoff writes: > >> The more I think about it, that kind of setup doesn't >> absolutely require multiple mailing lists. It could be >> accomplished with one p6p mailing list where the list of >> acknowledged tribal elders were more than just Larry. >> That is, if Dan Sugalski is the acknowledged watchdog of >> the internals API, everyone listens when he says: "fix >> this, it's not reentrant". When Schwern says "fix this, >> you didn't supply test code" you do so. > > That still means that everybody has to read everything. Well maybe not _read_ everything, but certainly scan the subject lines and make a guess on how interested you are in the content. There are parts of this project that I'm very interested in, parts that I'd like to follow the discussions on when I have spare time (hah!) and some parts that I have no real interest in. It would be very useful to me if I could filter various lists into different mailboxes for reading with the appropriate amount of urgency. Dave... -- <http://www.dave.org.uk> European Perl Conference (Sept 22/24, ICA, London) <http://yapc.org/Europe/> "Keats and Yeats are on your side, but you lose, 'cos Wilde is on mine."Thread Previous